A Chance Encounter in Mr Baumgartner's Clockwork Emporium
Previous
RANDOM
Modestly priced watches: Glycine Airman Airfighter
Next

First Look at Apple’s new Apple Watch (fka iWatch) / Apple launches a really nice Ikepod

by Gavin Foo on September 10, 2014

First Look & Review of the new Apple Watch 

4347451711b6f30d44c0ddd36209975833d6c6b6_xlarge

Let it first be known that I thrive on technology. Not just as a consumer – I’m one of those ‘early adopters’ that must consistently have the latest and greatest phone/ 4kTV/ curvedscreen/ laptop/ gadget/ fill-in-the-blanks. I’m even writing this on a rather buggy Yosemite beta because the call of my inner nerd is stronger than practicality.

Even in ‘wearable computing’, I’ve flirted with some of the pioneers – from the simple iPod nano-to- watch conversion, to the Metawatch and then the Pebble. More recently, I bought (and subsequently sold) a Devon Tread 1 – a hybrid electro-mechanical time-only watch that is in the world of haute horology ‘crossing the line’ between technological innvovation and what is traditionally accepted in a mechanical watch. Truth be told, it is perhaps much harder, much more emotional, and infinitely more romantic to find new ways to tell the time and other information mechanically – without the use of an electric battery – all within archaic, unwritten boundaries of what is acceptable in a mechanical watch. Perhaps the same boundaries that makes a mechanical Patek 2-3 times that of its quartz equivalent.

The simplest way to illustrate this is to think of a mechanical singing bird we read as kids in 101 Arabian Nights (the fairytales, not the DVD set by Private). If you’ve ever seen a fully mechanical Reuge singing bird, you would be fascinated by how a spring brings to life hundreds of tiny gears and flywheels to activate mechanically-driven servos and a leather baffle that literally breathes life to the singing voice of the mechanical bird. It’s electric cousin is made by Mattel in China a whole lot less, and runs on two AA batteries. Enter the Apple Watch.

ecb2e649f8d1dd08d47ddc89ddff535fabd2fd18_xlarge

The Apple Watch – where according to Jony Ive “horological experts around the world to help us understand the horological and historical significance of timekeeping”

Tim Cook also took to stage to say that the watch will ‘Redefine what people will expect from its category.’ Next chapter in Apple’s story’ And of course we all remember Jony Ive’s comments last week about how the Swiss watch industry has to be really afraid.

Read also:   Review: Bulgari Octo Finissimo Tourbillon

I was waiting to have my mind blown away, to be really excited – about as excited as i was when i first hunted for the Devon Tread 1.

And Apple launched an Ikepod with a processor and a Retina display.

Steel mesh and link metal bracelets; quilted leather loop and rubber bracelet options; deployment and tang buckles; available in yellow and rose gold, chrome and anodized black cases. Two different sizes, 3 distinct collections starting from US$349:

  • Apple Watch: polished case with custom alloy of stainless steel
  • Apple Sport: sport version with anodised aluminium case
  • Apple Edition: made of 18k gold that is twice as hard as standard gold (perhaps using a similar formula as Hublot’s magicgold from the same development 3rd party)

Personally, I think it kinda looks like a square Ikepod – it somehow has that design DNA of curved lines and sleek surfaces. Then again, I’m not too surprised as Sir Jon is a known Ikepod fan and collector. I did not see where those historical and horological inspirations were applied – perhaps in some some screens that mimicked iconic watch faces (I loved the Genta Mickey Mouse for example)

edfd3260df13ed9d2086eeef0fa3b40ce9a57d34_xlarge

Is the secret to success in the Apple Watch’s unique user interface? Apple calls it groundbreaking. They call it a digital crown infrared-LEDs and photo-diodes that allows you to do things like zoom, scrolling etc – ‘without blocking the screen’. Click on it, and returns to the home screen, or executes the action you want. I think it’s a stroke of genius in solving all the issues all current and previous smartwatches have or are suffering from.

ebda424b26c463ba2234cee0e2ca4613d208c02d_xlarge

The Apple Watch has built in near-field communication tech that allows for easier personal interaction with other Apple Watch wearers via taps. Built-in Siri; Retina-display with a sapphire-glass over it. 316L stainless steel. Built-in gyros, a powerful chip, haptic vibrator and a speaker. Zirconia back with sapphire lenses to detect pulserate etc. Inductive charging solution and a claimed accuracy of + – 50 milliseconds from a mix of online and built-in (quartz). Basically everything but your kitchen sink. Everything that other smartwatch makers have or are planning to have. But just fitting everything together well with an amazing UI and UX.

Read also:   Deployant Events: Highlights of Horological Events of the last Fortnight

8aa859f5717a1a5c80a1c2b723a0734fa39b84f1_xlarge

I do like the different watch faces that go beyond time/date ushering in advanced functions like astronomy, moonphases, and i think i saw and equation-of-time-ish thingamagig somewhere.

7382303226a9f08004599da8928e762cf268dd3a_xlarge

So what do I think?

I think that this is the best wearable computing device ever, that beats hands down anything i’ve owned, seen or experienced in the category. Period.

I think it’s a nicely designed device and especially so for those that like Jony’s design philosphy. It’s a little too Ikepod-ish in my opinion, but hey, some people prefer Priuses to Huaracans.

I think Apple was spot on in introducing 18K gold devices – addressing the Veblen-centric luxury and collector crowd that do not want to be with the rest of the million masses – but even that could be a little tenuous. But it’s better than nothing. I would liken it to Vertu – standard innards encased in precious metals and sapphire for those who want to stand out from what the masses have. I suspect that Apple will not price their 18K Edition watches as ridiculous as Vertu has. But in that, they cannot reap the benefits of conspicuous luxury that traditional horology implies and enjoys.

“It’s functional and beautiful…. and empowers people…a most personal device that Apple has ever created..” says Tim Cook.

I think it will sell very well. For every single collector spending the average $35,000 for a watch, there are tens of thousands more that will consider $350 fair dinkum for a timekeeper. Apple will sell millions of this – a beautiful personal device with a great user interface. But Apple’s success will ultimately be it’s biggest stumbling block in the watch world. Utility is one thing. There will always be a place for things that makes one’s life richer and better. But a watch is a personal statement, and individual thing – more fashion and desirability than anything else. Having the exact same thing that millions of others will have isn’t something the traditional watch buyer has in mind when he goes to the store. Will Apple change this adoption pattern? Or will it suffer the same fate as what is happening to its iPhone? Time will tell… in 2015 according to Tim Cook.

Looks much nicer in Photoshopped pix. In real life…bleh.. Photo credit: ArsTechnica/Megan Geuss

So should Switzerland be afraid? For those that have non mechanical hearts and who have relied just too much on the swiss marketing myth and rigmarole – you have every right to be and should start sweating – because the mass consumer now has something really well priced and compelling. And I think this is a great thing for the industry at large. The lazier brands in the traditional watch world will be pushed to innovate and create more compelling watches for the watch enthusiast – it may no longer be enough to just put a $10 Miyota movement in a really cool case; splash a few models and celebs in an ad; and call it haute.

Read also:   Review: Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda Chronor Anniversaire

But for the middle to higher-tier watch brands that pay attention to things like hand finishing, complexity and new ways of telling time even within the tight confines of what’s mechanically possible – they’re more than safe. The Apple Watch is still a compendium of lithium batteries and circuit boards that cannot and doesn’t detract from the emotional, romantic and human element that define haute horology and watchmaking in general. And its impact even less so in the storied world of independent watchmaking where personal stories, individualism, and spirits of entrepreneurship and gusto add on to the magic of the mechanical.

As Senatus’ Kien Lee puts it in his Facebook post; “Different customers. Different demographic. Different aesthetics. Different appeal.”

But it is as Tim Cook says – it’s a beautiful personal device. That’s it. A device. It mimics horology. It’s not a mechanical watch.

I would definitely buy one in 18K and customize a croc strap. I always wanted a cheap Ikepod. This one just happens to tell more than the time.

###

redgoldapple

What's your reaction?
I Love It
0%
Cool
0%
It's OK
0%
What?
0%
I Hate It
0%
6 Comments
Leave a response
  • September 10, 2014 at 7:01 pm

    Great written article and so fast after the Apple presentation. Well done!

  • Kunal Khemka
    September 10, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    For me, a smart watch will never replace traditional horology. That said, Apple has hit the nail with this one. Great design, and this has to be seen as a Fun product. It looks good and it is something one can have some fun with. Also, a useful fitness tool. But for the masses, Apple has come up with something brilliant and I guess many brands (whether Swiss or other) will be worried.

    Good design overall.

    One question; can one own this without the need to put a SIM card inside? For example if someone does not want telephone functionality and sms’s on their wrist.

  • watchk crazy guy
    September 10, 2014 at 1:25 pm

    Is it solid 18K for the Apple Edition? If so, the price may be > USD$5,000

  • Gavin Foo
    September 10, 2014 at 11:22 am

    thanks mate…. errors corrected!

  • September 10, 2014 at 11:20 am

    Nice-ish thoughts, but a pity that the author reduces his credibility by having two spelling mistakes “… people will expect form it’s category…” (sic) in the otherwise discerning article.

Leave a Reply

powered by gf
Translate »